Re: Draft Abstract for Fall DNP Meeting (Michigan State University)

From: Michael Murray (murray@CyclotronMail.tamu.edu)
Date: Sat Jun 29 2002 - 18:32:37 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Murray: "Comments on Ratios2.04"

      Dear Steve,
              it looks good to me.
                 Michael
    
    Quoting "Stephen J. Sanders" <ssanders@ku.edu>:
    
    > Hi,
    > Below is a draft abstract that I would like to submit to the
    > mini-symposium
    > on "Gluon Saturation at RHIC" at the Fall DNP meeting.  The
    > abstract deadline is Monday so please send comments and corrections
    > before
    > then.  Thanks. 
    > 
    > ...steve
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > ABSTRACT:
    > Charged-Particle Pseudorapidity Densities at BRAHMS
    > 
    > S.J. Sanders for the BRAHMS Collaboration
    > 
    > One of the suggested signatures for a saturation of the number of
    > parton
    > collisions in central nucleus-nucleus collisions at higher energies is
    > a
    > limit on the production of charged particles [1-3].  The BRAHMS
    > experiment
    > has measured charged-particle pseudorapidity densities as a function
    > collision centrality at sqrt[s_nn]=130 GeV [4] and 200 GeV [5] for the
    > pseudorapidity range of ­4.7<=eta<=4.7.  Close to beam rapidity, the
    > pseudorapidity densities at the two energies scale in a manner
    > consistent
    > with a limiting fragmentation picture in which the excitations of the
    > fragment baryons saturate at a moderate collision energy, independent
    > of
    > system size.  At mid-rapidity for the 5% most central events we find a
    > 14%
    > increase in pseudorapidity density at sqrt[s_nn]=200 GeV relative to
    > sqrt[s_nn]=130 GeV. The calculations of Kharzeev and Levin [3], which
    > include gluon saturation effects,  are in reasonable agreement with
    > this
    > result.  We note, however, that an alternative calculation [6] gives
    > comparably good results without including saturation effects.  This
    > talk
    > will present the BRAHMS results at the two RHIC energies in the context
    > of
    > current models. Data on p+p scattering at the highest RHIC energy will
    > also
    > be presented.
    > 
    > 
    > 
    > [1] L.V. Gribov, E.M Levin and M.G. Ryskin, Phys. Rep. 100, 1(1983).
    > [2] K.J. Eskola, K. Kajantie and K. Tuominen, Phys. Lett. B497,
    > 39(2001).
    > [3] D. Kharzeev and E. Levin, Phys. Lett. B 523, 79(2001).
    > [4] I.G. Bearden et al., Phys. Lett. B523, 227(2001).
    > [5] I.G. Bearden et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (2002).
    > [6] Zi-Wei Lin et al., Phys. Rev. C 64, 011902R(2001); and Zi-wei Lin,
    > private communication.
    > 
    
    
    
    Michael Murray, Cyclotron TAMU, 979 845 1411 x 273, Fax 1899
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jun 29 2002 - 18:33:24 EDT