Re: DNP meeting draft (50-60% central!!!!)

From: Stephen J. Sanders (ssanders@ku.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 28 2002 - 09:14:29 EDT

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: DNP meeting draft" 

    Dear Jens Jorgen and Claus,
Following up on the response I just sent to Hiro:  If you are actually 
showing 50-60% central,
please be sure to qualify this.  There is a good reason that we stop at 
40-50% central in the
mult paper--  For more peripheral cuts the uncertainties become HUGE. A 
statement of
"very peripheral, roughly 50-60% central" might be supportable...

Regards,
Steve

>  I have already seen
>h++h- spectrum ratios at 90 deg (between 0-5% central) and (50-60%) that
>evidence the high pt supp. for the central.
>

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Jun 28 2002 - 09:17:01 EDT