Hi, You can find the next (and almost final) draft of the ratios paper here: http://www.nbi.dk/~ekman/RatioDraft2.04.ps http://www.nbi.dk/~ekman/RatioDraft2.04.pdf There's a few things I don't understand completely (marked with ????). I would like to change a few things before we submit. - The pid plot will be nicer with the new data, I'll try to look at this tomorrow. - The two first sentences in the summary are not good, but I can't come up with something better at the moment. - In my opinion we should either skip the AMPT comparison or conclude more from it. - I don't like the idea of reading two points of a curve, plot a straight line between and quote a paper (Becattini). It's a bit too easy. - We should (once more) check up on the NA49 data. The data is taken from some plot (Trine?) and the errors are just added ad hoc. Cheers, Claus +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Claus Jørgensen | | Cand. Scient. Phone : (+45) 33 32 49 49 | | Cell : (+45) 27 28 49 49 | | Niels Bohr Institute, Ta-2, Office : (+45) 35 32 53 07 | | Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100, E-mail : ekman@nbi.dk | | University of Copenhagen Home : www.nbi.dk/~ekman/ | +-------------------------------------------------------------+
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Jun 26 2002 - 21:17:03 EDT