RE: QM abstract for net-proton

From: Dieter Rohrich (dieter@fi.uib.no)
Date: Wed May 15 2002 - 07:33:49 EDT

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "qm abstract submision deadline"

    Dear JH,
    
    I would shorten the title to:
    
    "Net baryon density as a function of rapidity in
    central Au+Au collisions at maximum RHIC energy"
    (see Ian's email).
    
    Rephrase first sentence (see Ian's proposal), especially
    "small rapidity loss". The (absolute) rapidity loss is largest at RHIC.
    
    Add a comparsion of RHIC200 data to SIS, AGS, SPS and RHIC130.
    There is a lot of nice data available.
    
    
    With best wishes,
    Dieter
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dieter Roehrich        |
    Fysisk institutt       |            Email: Dieter.Rohrich@fi.uib.no 
    Universitetet i Bergen |                        Tel:  +47-555-82722 
    Allegt. 55             |                        Fax:  +47-555-89440  
    N-5007 Bergen, Norway  | WWW: http://www.fi.uib.no/php/drhrich.html
    
    On Wed, 15 May 2002, Ian Bearden wrote:
    
    > Hi JH,
    > In the title, maybe a question mark...
    > "Where do the nucleons go? Net baryon density as  a function of rapidity in
    > central Au+Au collisions at maximum RHIC energy."
    > The first sentence is a bit too long, how about:
    > 
    > A primary goal at RHIC is to create and characterize the highly excited
    > matter resulting from nuclear collisions at extremely high energies.
    > I would suggest a slight rewording of the rest, but this probably more a
    > matter of taste (but you did ask for comments, so....)
    >  Theoretical models predict different net-baryon densities rapidity
    > dependence depending upon how the dynamics of baryon number transport is
    > treated.  In order to discriminate among the available models, measurements
    > of the rapidity dependence of the net-baryon density are necessary.
    >    BRAHMS is unique among the RHIC experiments in its ability to measure
    > identified charged particle spectra over a very broad range in rapidity and
    > transverse momentum.
    > 
    > In the last sentence..
    > Will you compare to other data p+p? 130GeV? SPS?, if so maybe say the
    > results will be compared to theoretical predictions and to other available
    > data.
    > 
    > 
    > That is my 2cents,
    > Cheers,
    > Ian
    >   -----Original Message-----
    >   From: owner-brahms-l@bnl.gov [mailto:owner-brahms-l@bnl.gov]On Behalf Of
    > J.H. Lee
    >   Sent: 14. maj 2002 22:37
    >   To: brahms-l@bnl.gov
    >   Subject: QM abstract for net-proton
    > 
    > 
    >   Dear Collaborators,
    > 
    >   Here is the "net-proton" abstract for QM02.
    >   Any comments would be appreciated.
    > 
    >   Regards, JH
    > 
    > 
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 15 2002 - 07:34:12 EDT