Re: Track matching offsets

From: Djamel Ouerdane (ouerdane@nbi.dk)
Date: Tue Feb 05 2002 - 09:25:43 EST

Next message: Betty Mcbreen: "Computer Maintenance"

Previous message: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: Track matching offsets"
In reply to: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: Track matching offsets"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

hi Flemming,


> Djam et others,
> 
> The jump in dang for MRS is related to the fact that run 5738-5748 are all
> MRS zero field run and shows how nicely the geometry is. 

I don't agree with that. The data comes from runs with field on 
(e.g. 5775 700A in D5). There were accidentally only 2 zero field runs 
(5739, 5748), which do not explain the other points.

This jump in dAng starts when the MRS was moved backward by 50 cm 
(around run 5732 I as fas as I remember). Now, why it does that is another 
story...

Djam

Next message: Betty Mcbreen: "Computer Maintenance"
Previous message: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: Track matching offsets"
In reply to: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: Track matching offsets"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Feb 05 2002 - 09:26:30 EST