Re: mult version 3.8

From: Stephen J. Sanders (ssanders@ku.edu)
Date: Wed Nov 28 2001 - 10:01:32 EST

  • Next message: Djamel Ouerdane: "Re: mult version 3.8"

    Hi Christian,
    The problem we have is not in getting the frames to join--that is easy.  The
    problem is  to also have acceptable labels, both in terms of size (your 
    example
    would be far too small for publication) and range (axis labels should 
    start from
    zero unless there is a good reason for an offset).  When you bring the
    axes together there is a tendency for one pane to blank the axis label on
    the adjacent pane.   Basically these are operations that
    will take a long time for a non-expert to get right and could delay 
    final submission.
    
    We should continue to work on figure improvements, but at some point 
    we'll have
    to go with what we have.
    
    One question, however:  Do you know how to get the numbers on an axis to 
    all
    have the same precision?  We have a problems with root taking the 
    sequence, for
    example, of 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5...  and doing the labels as 1, 1.5, 2, 
    2.5.    The journal
    will not accept this and I can't find a way to fix the problem within root.
    Have you figured this one out?
    
    Regards, Steve
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Nov 28 2001 - 10:02:26 EST