Re: mult. version 3.6

From: Trine S. Tveter (trine@lynx.uio.no)
Date: Tue Nov 27 2001 - 17:21:47 EST

  • Next message: Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje: "End of run"

    Hi,
    
    On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Jens Jørgen Gaardhøje wrote:
    
    > 2) For the increase of the p+p at midrapidity (also 14%) I don't recall that
    > we have exact number at the lower energy. This is an extrapolation right? If
    > we cannit find a better  number lets leave the rounded value. TRINE????
    
    As far as I know it's an extrapolation - I've never seen a pp datapoint quoted
    for 130 GeV.  Maybe one should say something like "For comparison, the similar
    number for proton-proton collisions at this energy is 2.5, which is 14%
    larger than the interpolated value at 130 GeV".
    
    > 3) For the increase of the central over p+p (IS THIS p+p or p+PBAR ????, I
    > guess the latter) 
    
    You're right - it's p+pbar.
    
    > we have 632 +- 55 and 2.48 +- 0.07
    >     After rescaling by 345/2 and adding errors in quadrature I get an
    > increase of 48 % +- 9%.
    > I have modified the text accordingly. Please check, someone.
    48% +- 13% (relative error 0.09 on ratio of 1.48?)
    
    > > We note that
    > > the measured distributions show a small increase in width with 
    > > decreasing centrality (from $\sigma_{RMS}=2.33\pm 0.02$ for 0-5\% 
    > > to $2.4 \pm 0.02$ for 40-50\%), to be compared to $RMS= 2.38 \pm 0.05$ 
    > > for the p+p data.  
    
    I'm not sure it's safe to quote a RMS value for pp when the numbers were
    extracted using a figure and a ruler .... maybe one should just say that the
    pp RMS value is within the AuAu RMS range, within errors and centrality 
    variations?  When I change the Eta scale within "reasonable limits as seen by
    my subjective eye", RMS_pp varies from 2.35+-0.015 to 2.395 +-0.015, with the 
    error 0.015 coming from ruler-measured dN/dEta error bars .....
    
    It would be nice with one sentence about physics implications ... what
    should we really expect for RMS_pp vs RMS_AuAu at this energy?  Any good 
    references on SPS data comparing RMS_AA (or data usable for extracting such) 
    for different centralities and to pp at the same energy?  What would be the
    width increase from 130 to 200 GeV (and with centrality) predicted by the 
    models?  
    
                                                Trine
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Nov 27 2001 - 17:23:36 EST