Re: Follow-up on shift report (DC)

From: Jerzy Cibor (ufcibor@cyf-kr.edu.pl)
Date: Wed Oct 31 2001 - 12:27:06 EST

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "Re: Follow-up on shift report (DC)"

    On  Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Zbigniew Majka wrote:
    > > There are two possibilities:
    > > 1. HV supply problem - similar situation was with T3 before.
    > > [...]
    
    On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Flemming Videbaek wrote:
    > I do not get the comment on this-  could you elaborate -
    > [...]
    
    Dear Flemming,
    This time there may be really a short in T5-II, but we already had similar
    situations in mid-September:
    
    In the shift report from Sep 21 YKLee: "T3 Anode-1 and Cathode-1
    could not be turned on. Ramiro suspects there is a short."
    EYK on Sep 24: "T3-I is holding voltage again"
    
    Also for T5:
    On Sep 25 JN reported: "T5 Anode 1 still off and unresponsive"
    EJK on Sep 25: "T5 Anode 1 : now OK"
    
    
    As far as I remember all these was caused by a problem with HV supply
    (BRAHVO ?).
    
    Can it be the same this time ?
    
    Too bad T5 waited till I leave. How did it know, anyway?
    
    Regards,
    Jerzy
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 31 2001 - 12:28:05 EST