Hi Hiro, Thanks for the nice plots. They seem (at first glance, before I have finished my first cup of coffee!) more symmetric than the previous version. Is this true, or is my eye less skeptical before the caffiene kicks in? Certainly, the symmetrized with the Khaz. 'predicition' looks very good. thanks again, Ian > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-brahms-l@bnl.gov [mailto:owner-brahms-l@bnl.gov]On Behalf Of > Hironori Ito > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 7:22 AM > To: brahms-l@bnl.gov > Subject: new dndeta figures! (still BETA) > > > Hello. I made new 4 dndeta figures with new calibration. They > are still preliminary, so you are not allowed to show them outside of the > collaboration without the consent of the spokes person. However, it is > good enough for some people to start discussing a more detail of our new > paper. The files are located in > "http://pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~hito/dndeta/2001" > > Here is the list of 4 figures. > 1. dndeta_all.gif > dndeta for 6 centrality cuts by average of silicon and beam beam. > > 2. dndeta_part.gif > dndeta par participant pair for 6 centrality cuts by average of > silicon and beam beam. > > 3. dndeta_sym.gif > symetrized dndeta for 6 centrality cuts with the prediction by > Khazeev and Levin(dash-dot line) > > 4. dndeta_part_ybeam.gif > dndeta shifted by ybeam (shown only 0-5 % and 30-40%) > > > hiro > > (Note: Tiles are not included in the figures, but they are still used for > centrality and overall normalization. I am still having trouble matching > Tiles to Si and BB.) > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 10 2001 - 02:56:11 EDT