Dear Ramiro, I am very glad that you recovered from your nervous break down which hit you on October 4 night shift. It was a really unconventional behaviour to quit in the middle of the shift. Your collabolarors were waiting for the results to modify working conditions of the DCs. (Due to satisfactory efficiency indicated by off line analysis, such survey was not necessary before. Unfortunately, a code had a bug.) By the way, I am curious why you are so allergic to the DC performance. Best regards, Zbigniew ----- Original Message ----- From: Apache <apache@pii3.brahms.bnl.gov> To: <brahms-l@bnl.gov>; <olchansk@bnl.gov>; <videbaek@bnl.gov> Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2001 9:50 PM Subject: Shift report 20011006 08:00-16:00 > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Date: Sat Oct 6 15:50:35 2001, Shift: 08:00-16:00 > Supervisor: R. Debbe, with: none > Log book#9 pages 105 - 106 > > Shift Summary: > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Machine status: Store started at 07:25 died at 9:10 by > massive QLI At 9:45 MCR announced Beta start squeeze studies > that are still under way. > > Achievements: Run 5193 233K trigg 1 > > Detector problems: Nothing new, pedestals in TPM2 are back to > sigmas of 1.5 - 2 channels. Yesterday Eun-Joo took data with > DVMs back in the data but DVM1 out of the trigger. Peaks are > cleanly seen in the other two active DVMs. I will move DVM1 > behind D5 during next access, and then we can resume monitoring > the drift velocity while we acquire data. > ------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Oct 07 2001 - 17:23:46 EDT