Hi Hiro, I'm not sure what an impacient is, but I think the figure looks pretty good. May I ask what needs to be done before this fig moves from 'close to final' to final? What is (roughly) the error from point to point? Nice job, thanks for the plot! Ian > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-brahms-l@bnl.gov [mailto:owner-brahms-l@bnl.gov]On Behalf Of > Hironori Ito > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:48 PM > To: brahms-l@bnl.gov > Subject: dndeta figures for impacients > > > Hello. I made (revised) the dndeta for this year run. It is > located in "http://pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~hito/dndeta/2001/dndeta_200.gif" > It is meant to be used for starting discussion of mult paper and not to be > used for showing in the conference. Although I am not sure who is the > paper commitee for this year, if you were in the last year, you can > certainly start thinking about the new paper. About the figure, > although it is not final figure, from my estimate, it is very close to > final. It is not like the one I made earlier for presentation which did > not have right normaization as I stated at that point. (Steve and I > still have a bit more of checks and changes to do. like it is not quite > symmetic.) Anyway, the paper commitee should start thinking about it if > we are going for PRL. > > hiro > > (Note: Cuts on the figures are 0-5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-30, 30-40 and 40-50%) > > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 04:15:02 EDT
