Re: Urgent!! Final draft of multiplicity paper needs comments NOW!

From: Ion-Sorin Zgura (zis@rcf2.rhic.bnl.gov)
Date: Fri Aug 03 2001 - 19:09:48 EDT

  • Next message: Stephen J. Sanders: "Re: Urgent!! Final draft of multiplicity paper needs comments NOW!"

    Dear Steve,
    
    We send you some comments on the paper "Charged particle .... ":
    
    Taking into account the idea on the possible
    dependence of the total number of charged particles on the amount of
    hadronic rescattering we believe that a comparison with HIJING predictions
    and UrQMD predictions, respectively, because of their very different
    assumptions. For example, the charged particle multiplicity predicted by
    the HIJING Code is - for impact parameters in the range [0.0;17.0] Fm for
    all rapidities - mch=1182+/-20.4 (mtot=2137), and the same quantity,
    predicted by UrQMD Code, for the same conditions, is mch=1820 (mtot=3143).
    This observation can be considered for the role of the subnucleonic
    processes, too. The importance of the collision geometry can be treated in
    two aspects, too. First of all, we can compare the multiplicities in the
    full rapidity range and in the midrapidity range {[-2.2;+2.2]}. The
    obtained values using UrQMD codes are: mch=1235.0+/-41.1,
    mtot=2072.0+/-68.3, respectively. Using HIJING Code the following values
    are obtained: mch =711.8+/-14.7, mtot=1230.0+/-25.4.
    Therefore, a higher termalization can be supposed in the central region too. The second way
    can be related to a phenomenological geometric picture of the relativistic
    nuclear collisions (C.Besliu, Al.Jipa - Rev.Roum.Phys.33(1988)409,
    Rom.J.Phys.37(1992);   Al.Jipa - J.Phys.G: Nucl.Part.Phys.22(1996)231),
    adapted for colliders (C.Besliu et al - Rom.Rep.Phys.52(8,9)(2000)). The
    calculation of the participant number can be performed at each impact
    parameter and compared with the simulation code predictions (Analysis Note 17).
    There is a good agreement (including Table I from this paper). A comment
    can be introduced on the limiting fragmentation, too. This assumption was
    used to introduce
    so-called "cumulative effect" (see, for example, A.M.Baldin -
    Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.IV(1980)95, C.Besliu et al - Nucl.Phys.A672(2000)446).
    This effect can be related to the fluctuations and non-equilibrium
    processes. Finally, a short unimportant request: after the last election
    the Ministry of Research merged (jointed) with Romanian Ministry of
    National Education;  therefore, now we have Romanian Ministry of Education
    and  Research. If it is possible to complete this denomination will be
    very nice for us.
    
    Thank you!
    
    Sincerely yours,
    
    Alexandru JIPA
    Calin BESLIU
    Sorin ZGURA
    Catalin RISTEA
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Aug 03 2001 - 19:10:21 EDT