Mult paper

From: Jens Jorgen Gaardhoje (gardhoje@nbi.dk)
Date: Thu Aug 02 2001 - 10:41:57 EDT

  • Next message: Michael Murray: "Re: Mult paper"

    Dear friends 
    
    I am back from my vacation absence.
    
    I have read the latest version of the mult. paper.
    
    I like what I see and would urge submittal ASAP to PLB. I suppose that
    the length requirements have been checked.
    
    A.
    A few comments of small importance:
    p. 4, para 2: The quoted pseudo... -> THis pseudorapidity coverage
    reflects the geometrical coverage of the array and the extended range
    ...
    
    p 6 para 3 l-6 from bottom: remove; also  ,before 'be located'.
    
    p 7 l 1. two background-> summed background
    
    p8 l7: is necessary to eliminate -> eliminates
    
    p8 l9: Based on HIJING simulations it is estimated that this corresponds
    to 95% of the total nuclear cross section.
    
    p 9 para 2 l2 : within ... acceptance -> in the range
    
    p 11 last para: In summary, the BRAHMS...
         last para l 4 remove 'apparent'
    
                   l 8 :  ... behavior is seen for nucleus-nucleus
    collisions and is in fact already reached at the lower energy.
    
    B.
    A more substantial comment: 
    
    We are all still bothered by the difference between tiles and Si for the
    most peripheral collisions. This difference looks like a TMA additive
    offset of 10-15 particles. Thus it only reveals itself for low total
    number of particles. 
    Does this difference subsist if the centrality selection is made with a
    3rd party detector?
    (e.g. the BB?).
    In any case if we have no clue as to the reason for this discrepancy and
    to a remedy I still propose to show fig. 16 as is, and accept the
    difference as a measure of our syst,. error.
    
    C.
    I thought  we ' pluralis communalis' did not like references to
    preprints etc, but only favored fully published papers. I have no
    personal problem with such references, but we should not zigzag in our
    policy. Leave it now and in the future.
    
    Steve suggest to submit the paper by Friday: You certainly have my 
    blessing! 
    And congratulation collectively for a godd job!
    
    cheers
    JJ
      
    
    ____________________________________________________
    JENS JORGEN GAARDHOJE
    Assoc. Prof. of Physics, Dr. Scient.
    
    Niels Bohr Institute, 
    University of Copenhagen
    Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen
    Denmark.
    
    Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09 (dir) 
         (+45) 35 32 52 09 (secr)
    Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16
    Email: gardhoje @ nbi.dk
    Home page: http://alf.nbi.dk/~gardhoje
    
    -Chair Ph. D. School of Physics at NBI.F.AFG.
     (secr. Frank Kristensen 35 32 04 41, Ørsted Lab.)
    -Member Danish National Commission for UNESCO 
     (secr. Ulla Holm 35 32 52 72, NBI)
    ___________________________________________________
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Aug 02 2001 - 10:42:38 EDT