Fw: RHIC Planning Meeting minutes

From: Flemming Videbaek (videbaek@sgs1.hirg.bnl.goV)
Date: Fri May 25 2001 - 14:09:56 EDT

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "Fw: Announcement of Intention to Publish another STAR Paper"

    FYI
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Flemming Videbaek
    Physics Department
    Brookhaven National Laboratory
    
    tlf: 631-344-4106
    fax 631-344-1334
    e
    Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:46 PM
    Subject: RHIC Planning Meeting
    
    
    > The next RHIC Machine/Detector Planning Meeting will be
    > WEDNESDAY,  MAY 30,   1:30PM
    > BUILDING 911  LG. CONF. RM
    >
    > Notes from this past Wednesday's meeting appended below.
    >
    > Tom
    >
    >
    ............................................................................
    ...............................
    >
    > RHIC Machine/Detector Planning Meeting
    > 5/23/01
    >
    > Todd Satogata updated the short-term schedule:
    > There will be no access over the 3-day Memorial Day weekend, except for
    > necessary controlled accesses.  Daytime access will resume on Tuesday,
    > and expected to continue until ~ June 1.  By that time both rings should
    > be cold, and power supply installation work complete.  The Siemens
    > load-test has yet to be scheduled.  This will occur sometime during the
    > month of June, but for now it is decided to continue with RHIC beam
    > setup using the Westinghouse motor generator.  When the Siemens test is
    > scheduled, there will be a few days advance notice (necessary for GE
    > people to be present), and there will be ~3 days of access into RHIC
    > while the tests are carried out.
    >
    > Fulvia Pilat discussed plans for weekly, scheduled machine development
    > periods once the machine has reached a stable operating mode.  The plan
    > is to have machine development periods for 12 hours on Wednesdays.  In
    > this vein, it is agreed that when stable conditions are reached, the
    > experiments would like to schedule weekly maintenance access periods of
    > ~1 shift.  It was pointed out that the relative timing of these two
    > activities should be given some thought (i.e. it may not be desirable to
    > have a machine development period immediately before or after a
    > maintenance shutdown).
    >
    > Reports from RCF and experiments indicate no changes from the previously
    > discussed start-up schedule.
    >
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 25 2001 - 14:07:01 EDT