Hi all, On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:23:31 +0100 (CET) Fouad Rami <Fouad.Rami@IReS.in2p3.fr> wrote concerning ": Re: AnNote23: dN/dEta from TPM1": > > > On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Bjorn H Samset wrote: > > > > > > - Looking at Fig.4 in the report of ... > > > > Not if you look at their figure 5. ... > > The bin size in Fig.4 and 5 is = 8cm. I did some futher work on the calibrations as outlined in BAN22. As mentioned there, I used 8 vertex bins |Vz| < 50 cm, and 100 bins in M. That resulted in the figures 4 and 5. As said in BAN22, the non-zero slope is something that need to be resolved. So I tried to go to the other extreem with 50 vertex bins in |Vz| < 50 cm, and 500 M bins. Then the slopes become (nearly) zero. However, I did not get to finish the analysis, 'cause I'm currently in Germany (damn, they switch around the z and y!), and will be for the rest of the week, with only a telnet connection from an Micros**t Windoze machine. I thought I should let you know. With respect to figures 5 in BAN22. It's defently worth to try and see what happens in narrower bins, say |Delta Vz| = 3 cm. Also, I#d like to remind you, that for FFS analysis, one has to accept a wider range in primary verticies to get enough statistics. These are things I'll look into when I get back home and can open a proper X connection using a proper OS, etc. Yours, Christian ----------------------------------------------------------- Holm Christensen Phone: (+45) 35 35 96 91 Sankt Hansgade 23, 1. th. Office: (+45) 353 25 305 DK-2200 Copenhagen N Web: www.nbi.dk/~cholm Denmark Email: cholm@nbi.dk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 20 2001 - 10:14:39 EST