qm01

From: Flemming Videbaek (videbaek@sgs1.hirg.bnl.goV)
Date: Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:28:00 EST

  • Next message: Flemming Videbaek: "BNL day during QM"

    >
    > Dear Collaborator,
    >
    > QM is getting very close, and it has become essential we as collaboration
    > gets an opportunity to review the material being presented at QM
    > I have had some discussions with Jens Jorgen regarding this and exchange
    of
    > ideas.
    > Enclosed in this mail is a plan for the plenary talk.
    > The idea is that it is centered on the physics results, and that all
    aspects
    > should be presented. In addition an overview of exp and performance from
    the
    > 2000 runs is planned, with at outlook for (all expected data from Brahms
    > this run).
    > There is bound to be some overlap with the parallel talk (IGB), the
    > highlights should be shown.
    >
    > Some of this material has been circulated.
    > It is imperative that all plots for both presentations but also for the
    > posters that physics plots that are intended to be shown gets posted on
    the
    > web accessible to the collaboration for review and comments to be
    circulated
    > within the collaboration. Over the next two day I myself will place
    figures,
    > tables that can be used in the presentation ahead of posting the actual
    > slides. I encourage you to comments on the plan as well as on the overall
    > analysis presented so far by others. I will further coordinate
    > presentation(s) and proceed with plots and slides.
    >
    > Best regards
    >
    > Flemming
    >
    >
    > I will like to refer you to a couple of places apart from the analysis
    notes
    >
    > Global analysis with Tiles, Sidet:
    >
    >
    http://www.rhic.bnl.gov/brahms/WWW/private/list_hyper/brahms-cent-l/0049.htm
    > l
    >
    > MRS analysis (PID)
    >
    > http://pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~jhlee/brahms/analysis/mrs/mrs_analysis.html
    > Some of the more recent plots, that comes from additional statistics and
    pt
    > cuts should be posted by
    > Later today (ref JHLee)
    >
    > TPM1 multiplicity analysis:
    > This is very much along the lines of Fouad's note, but done on a newer set
    > of data with (partial) results and documentation has bee put on
    > http://pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~videbaek/mrsdndeta/analysis.html
    >
    >
    > Potential slides and figs will be placed on
    > http://pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~videbaek/qm01/index.html
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > *****************************************************
    > Brahms talks & posters
    >
    > Monday: Overview 35  FV( presumably 30 +5?)
    > Friday: Particle ratios IGB (20+5)
    >
    > Instrumentation Posters
    > Bjoern Samset
    > Peter Christiansen
    >
    > Physics
    > MRS poster (Jhlee/Beavis)
    > Mult Tile/si (Hiro/Sanders)
    >
    > **********************************************************************
    > Plenary talk overview
    >
    > Introduction
    > - overview of talk
    >
    > Physics aim of Brahms
    > -         One/two page summary.
    >
    > 2000 Run
    > -         Spectrometers used.
    > -         Data summary
    > -         Acceptance, coverage
    >
    > Spectrometer Performance
    > -         Tpc resolutions,trackmatching, dp/p. (PC poster)
    > -         Refer to PC poster
    > -         MRS PID Plot, MassSq, Tofw matching. (MRS poster)
    > -         Spectra of h(+), h(-)
    >
    > Event Selections
    > -         Triggering vertex dist, resolutions (dz, dx)
    > -         Vertex determination from TPCs
    > -         Refer to BHS poster
    >
    > ZDC results
    > -  1n/2n energy dependence, compare with theoretical calc.
    >
    > Global observable.
    > -         Tile, Mult analysis.  (ref to
    > -         Procedure /results;
    > -         dN/dEta from MTP1 (as last week)
    >
    >
    > Hadron ratio's from spectrometer
    > -         Present highlights from Ian's parallel talk (refer to)
    > -         P-bar/p ratio at eta=0 eta=3
    > -         Pi+/pi- vs pt;
    > -         Compare p-bar/p to model (Cassing,..)
    > -         Deduce N(p-bar)-N(p) using p/pi and dN/deta - discuss compare to
    > model. Pt range.
    >
    > Forward view
    > -         Expectations from 2000 analysis
    > -         Extension to high p (and pt) forward; RICH performance plot.
    >
    > Summary
    >
    >
    > ------------------------------------------------------
    > Flemming Videbaek
    > Physics Department
    > Brookhaven National Laboratory
    >
    > tlf: 631-344-4106
    > fax 631-344-1334
    > e-mail: videbaek@bnl.gov
    >
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 08 2001 - 16:22:12 EST