Hi Flemming
I have taken a look at the proposed slides. as you request.
Apart from trivial problems with mispellings etc, that you no doubt have
fixed by now,
I think that the dn/dEta plot is not really so appealing.
It looks as if we are smuggling it in at the end in an unconvinced way.
The plot ought to be shown as the main result in synmmetrized form. This
is much more impressive and what people want to see. The Hijing calc.
can
be shown as an overlay.
The main physics point should be, in my opinion, that we can determine
the width and the INTEGRAL (i.e. N charged total), which is around 4000.
Its only nice if the width is larger than the Hijing width, more Bjorken
like.!
I like the TPC validation of the integral. If you believe it , it should
definetely be shown, event if that has large errors.
cheers
JJ
--
____________________________________________________
JENS JORGEN GAARDHOJE
Assoc. Prof. of Physics, Dr. Scient.
Niels Bohr Institute,
University of Copenhagen
Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen
Denmark.
Tlf: (+45) 35 32 53 09 (dir)
(+45) 35 32 52 09 (secr)
Fax: (+45) 35 32 50 16
Email: gardhoje @ nbi.dk
Home page: http://alf.nbi.dk/~gardhoje
-Chair Ph. D. School of Physics at NBI.F.AFG.
(secr. Frank Kristensen 35 32 04 41, Ørsted Lab.)
-Member Danish National Commission for UNESCO
(secr. Ulla Holm 35 32 52 72, NBI)
___________________________________________________
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 03 2000 - 07:34:56 EDT