Hi I could have send this to all. For the 62.4 GeV I am pretty happy overall. "Their data tables are not yet up on the webpage but I did inut some of the 62.4 gev piplus data and compared with ours and the ISR. See http://www4.rcf.bnl.gov/~videbaek/analysis/pp62figs/piplus_64.pdf At pt<1 there is perfect agreement, at pt 1.5 and up the phenix data are possibly 10% above. So this is pretty good." Flemming Videbaek videbaek @ bnl.gov Brookhaven National Lab Physics Department Bldg 510D Upton, NY 11973 phone: 631-344-4106 cell : 631-681-1596 On Feb 7, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Michael Murray wrote: > Minutes of BRAHMS analysis meeting 7 February 2011 > ========================================== > No slides today only discussion. > > JH pointed out that Phenix has published a very comprehensive publication of pp results at 62 and 200GeV. We should make some comparison with them (Note our dN/dy is slightly higher). > >>>> Todo: We want to compare out data to PHENIX > > There was a discussion of CuCu analysis. >>>> Todo: Michael will ask Selemon if he has included low pt protons in analysis. > > Steve has redone the flattening parameters as a function of time to clean up places where detectors mis-behaved. He hopes to have results for next meeting. > > dp paper: PRC says that they have received a referee report > > JH will try to get us something new soon. > > The 21st is a Federal Holiday so we will probably change the time of the next meeting. > > =============================================================== > > > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-dev-l mailing list > Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Mon Feb 07 2011 - 16:59:28 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Feb 07 2011 - 17:00:37 EST