Re: [Brahms-dev-l] dp/paper

From: Michael Murray <mjmurray_at_ku.edu>
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 08:48:28 -0500
OK I will work on collating the inputs and trying to make it more  
like a paper and less of a textbook.
Michael

On Mar 31, 2010, at 5:37 PM, flemming videbaek wrote:

> Hi, (particular Michael, Ramiro and Ian)
>
> I talked today with Ramiro on the paper. I think the most important  
> issue is to expand on the summary.
> For those available for the Friday meeting (yes I know it is good  
> friday) it would be good to hear what can be considered as
> input for this.
> The second issue is to maybe reduce the length of the introduction,  
> but I do not consider this quite as important.
> I will like to plan to have the paper in a form by mid next week so  
> I can send the abstract to the other collaborations.
>
> regards
> 	Flemming
>
>
>
> Flemming Videbaek
> videbaek @ bnl.gov
> Brookhaven National Lab
> Physics Department
> Bldg 510D
> Upton, NY 11973
>
> phone: 631-344-4106
> cell     :  631-681-1596
>
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Brahms-dev-l mailing list
Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l
Received on Thu Apr 01 2010 - 09:48:29 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Apr 01 2010 - 09:49:29 EDT