Hi Pawel, thanks for the reply. I saw an AMPT calculation for pp_at_200 GeV in the paper arXiv:nucl-th/0411110v3, Fig 27. If PYTHIA can be used, does any one have PYTHIA data_at_200 GeV? Selemon, On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Pawel Staszel <ufstasze_at_if.uj.edu.pl>wrote: > Hi Selemon, > I'm fine thank you. > I think that AMPT is not > suggested for p+p. For p+p you can use PYTHIA alone. > I cc this to the list for more opinions. > > Best regards, > Pawel. > > > > Selemon Bekele wrote: > >> Hi Pawel, >> >> hope you are doing fine. Are you making files for pp_at_200 GeV too? >> If that is the case, I can compare the CuCu_at_200 GeV Raa to AMPT. >> Let me know. >> >> Selemon, >> >> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:32 AM, Pawel Staszel <ufstasze_at_if.uj.edu.pl<mailto: >> ufstasze_at_if.uj.edu.pl>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I will install ampt results later today. >> Best regards, >> Pawel. >> >> >> J.H. Lee wrote: >> >> Hi, Flemming and Selemon, >> >> Please find HIJINGB21 histogram files in >> /brahms/data01/scratch/jhlee/hijingB21_files/. >> Particle species, centralities, and bin sizes are as requested. >> I think statistics are good enough for comparisons with the data >> we have. The corresponding Npart values are in the files >> as a histogram. Please let me know if you see some problems. >> If you are satisfied, I'll generate the same for pp, dAu and >> AuAu at 62 GeV. >> >> JH >> >> >> _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l_at_lists.bnl.gov https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Fri Mar 13 2009 - 12:01:20 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Fri Mar 13 2009 - 12:02:26 EDT