[Brahms-dev-l] Analysis checks

Hi:   On working with the 200 GeV AuAu data I find a number of
runs with "strange" results.   There are obviously a large number
of places where calibrations or even the raw data could be off, but
I would like to make sure that I monitor as many common
problems as possible.

Is it possible to develop a list of signature histograms?   For example,
for the centrality calibrations it is very useful to track the ratio of
central to mid-peripheral events corresponding to the min-bias trigger.
This can be done as a function of run number, allowing for a quick
check of data quality.   Have people found other measures that can
be used to easily flag bad calibrations or runs?
...steve


_______________________________________________
Brahms-dev-l mailing list
Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l