Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Efficiency histogram...

From: Truls Martin Larsen <trulsml@nbi.dk>
Date: Tue Feb 07 2006 - 08:50:54 EST
Hi,

I also think the 2. alternative is good! And I also agree with you pawel
that doing it like: correction/effiDb , correction/accmap and
correction/geant...

But it should be in a place that is backed up!
I think the file sizes of the eff files are ~ 1MB...correct me if I'm
wrong Pawel... 

AccMap files are ~10MB !?!
What about the geant corr. files? Selemon?

Cheers,
	Truls

On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 14:01 +0100, Pawel Staszel wrote:
> Hi Flemming and Truls,
> this is also my point, see my second email for more details
> Pawel.
> 
> 
> Flemming Videbaek wrote:
> 
> > Hi Truls,
> >
> > Well there is no specific official place, maybe the 62 gev cucu are 
> > all in one place, but anything else is all over the place. What is the 
> > approximate size of all these file?
> > I am thinking they can be put into a place that is actually backed up
> > as a specific place (your option 2).
> >
> > Flemming
> > --------------------------------------------
> > Flemming Videbaek
> > Physics Department
> > Bldg 510-D
> > Brookhaven National Laboratory
> > Upton, NY11973
> >
> > phone: 631-344-4106
> > fax:        631-344-1334
> > e-mail: videbaek @ bnl.gov
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Truls Martin Larsen" <trulsml@nbi.dk>
> > To: "Pawel Staszel" <ufstasze@if.uj.edu.pl>
> > Cc: <brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 5:29 AM
> > Subject: [Brahms-dev-l] Efficiency histogram...
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> have we decided on any official directory for the efficiency files yet?
> >>
> >> I have a suggestion if there is no official decision yet:
> >>
> >> make an efficDb directory in the directory where the official
> >> ltr/gtr/dst files are and put the root file there, eg CuCu 62.4GeV:
> >>
> >> ltr/gtr/dst files are in: /brahms/data21/data/run05/cucu/62/ (here they
> >> are pr run like: r[RUNNO])
> >> so for efficiency files related to these files could be:
> >> /brahms/data21/data/run05/cucu/62/efficDb
> >>
> >> 2. Alternative:
> >>
> >> make official efficDb for all efficiency calculations in:
> >> /brahms/data21/data/efficDb
> >>
> >> this 2. alternative could also be used for official acceptance maps:
> >> /brahms/data21/data/acceptanceMaps
> >> and for our corrections (from geant simulation of decay, mult. scat.
> >> etc...):
> >> /brahms/data21/data/corrections
> >>
> >>
> >> 3. alternative is to add 3 extra data fields to the BrFileCatalogInfo,
> >> which would be the location of the eff. file, the accMap file and the
> >> geant corr. file for a specific run.
> >>
> >>
> >> Another question about the efficiency files:
> >>
> >> Many histograms have in their title a list of run numbers listed. Does
> >> this list mean that the efficiency is only valid for these runs? or all
> >> runs between lowest and highest run number? Or is it just a list of
> >> information to show which runs were used to do the calculation, and that
> >> they are useful for a longer range of runs?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Truls
> >> -- 
> >> *---------------------------------*
> >> |http://www.nbi.dk/~trulsml      /
> >> |Truls Martin Larsen            /
> >> |trulsml@nbi.dk                .
> >> |The Niels Bohr Institute     //
> >> |Work Address:               / \0
> >> |Blegdamsvej 17             /\_/
> >> |DK-2100 Copenhagen        /  /
> >> |Tel: +45 35325269        / --
> >> |                        /_/  |
> >> |Home address:          /     \
> >> |Holger Danskes Vej 28H|      '
> >> |DK-2000 Frederiksberg |
> >> |Denmark               |
> >> |Mob: +45 20974802     |
> >> *----------------------*
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Brahms-dev-l mailing list
> >> Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov
> >> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l
> >>
> >
> >
> 

_______________________________________________
Brahms-dev-l mailing list
Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l
Received on Tue Feb 7 17:25:04 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 07 2006 - 17:25:11 EST