Hi, I realize there was a "bug" in the code... It had an exponential growth in the number of queries... doing regsister for a single run, the general update() in a loop... Sorry for slowing thing down... it could have been avoided if the kInit test was correct... Who is the "maintainer" of this class? So i guess 2 things need to be changed: BrFileCatalogManager::Register(): if (kInit) -> if (fStatus == kInit) BrFileCatalogInfo::Update(): change the "Select *" to only the nesecceary tables... maybe also remove the printf() statements in this file to Verbose or Debug... as I (a regular user) does not understand what the printing means... Cheers, Truls >hmmm. I looked into the guts of the BrFileCatalog manager... > >I guess I did it wrong. IT should be ::Register() before ::Init(). > >This should have prompted a warning in ::Register(), but it says: > >if (kInit) { > Warning(blablabla...) > return... >} > >It so happens that kInit is the first occurence in enum EDbStatus, >which I believe assigns kInit = 0! So the warning is never replayed... > >I guess is should read: > >if (fStatus == kInit) right??? > >Cheers, > Truls On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 10:14 -0500, Hironori Ito wrote: > Ok. Looking more carefully (a few minutes), you (BrFileCatalogInfo???) > was doing the following query. > > "SELECT * FROM DataVersion WHERE ProductionVerId = 30 and RunNo = 13899" > > Now, the content of this table (DataVersion) is the following. > +-----------------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ > | Field | Type | Null | Key | Default | Extra | > +-----------------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ > | VersionId | int(11) | | PRI | NULL | auto_increment | > | VersionNo | int(11) | | | 0 | | > | DataTypeId | int(11) | | | 0 | | > | InputVerId | int(11) | | | 0 | | > | BratVer | varchar(15) | | | | | > | RootVer | varchar(15) | | | | | > | Script | text | | | | | > | Creator | varchar(30) | | | | | > | Comments | text | YES | | NULL | | > | RunNo | int(11) | YES | | NULL | | > | ProductionVerId | int(11) | | | 0 | | > +-----------------+-------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ > > Now, from the above query, you don't need to get all data from this > table. Particularly, you don't need to get "Script, Creator, Comments, > BratVer, RootVer". Since you are tring to get all (by Select * from > DataVersion), this might be the reason for slowness. After glacing at > BrFileCatalogXXX codes, I did not see this particular command. Someone > who wrote this code can check this and modify the code??? > > Hiro > > > Truls Martin Larsen wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >This is the code in banapp... It uses the BrFileCalalogManager, no > >custom query stuff. The idea is to give dst2tre a run range, begin run > >and end run number, and then the code retrives the location of the dsts > >that exist file catalog for given version and production, ie it just a > >loop from begin run number to end run number... > > > >So if I understand correctly: > > > >1. Init FileCatalog manager. > >2. Register runs > >3. call filecatalog update > >4 retive the filcatalog run. > > > >How can one do this i a proper way, without loading the DB to much??? > > > >Cheers, > > Truls > > > >On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 09:16 -0500, Hironori Ito wrote: > > > > > >>Hello, Truls. Are you querying FILECATALOG with some strange way in > >>your own program? MySQL server is having tough time querying your > >>request. If you are using your own query command, I suggest you ( as > >>well as any other person who use own SQL command for query) to check if > >>you can decrease the load to MySQL server. Otherwise, the server > >>response is too slow for other person. > >> > >>Hiro > >> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-dev-l mailing list > Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l > _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Thu Feb 2 10:43:52 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 02 2006 - 10:43:59 EST