Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights

Yes, The official brat should be updated.  Otherwise the new AuAu  
cent calibration
will not be incorporated in the lastest dsts.
..steve
On Nov 25, 2005, at 2:05 PM, Johnson, Erik B wrote:

>
> Flemming,
>    I haven't changed anything in brat for about a couple weeks  
> now.  So as long as the offical brat has been updated before that  
> then we are good.
> I know Hiro had a question about the flow code at one point and it  
> looked like he didn't have the newest version.  I'm assuming that  
> he resolved this issue.
> Erik
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Flemming Videbaek [mailto:videbaek@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov]
> Sent: Fri 11/25/2005 12:56 PM
> To: Johnson, Erik B; Brahms Dev
> Subject: Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights
>
> Hi Erik,
>
> Should the official brat be updated before the DSTs for the auau  
> are processed?
> Let us have an answer before processing starts.
>
> Flemming
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Flemming Videbaek
> Physics Department
> Bldg 510-D
> Brrokhaven National Laboratory
> Upton, NY11973
>
> phone: 631-344-4106
> fax:        631-344-1334
> e-mail: videbaek @ bnl.gov
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Johnson, Erik B" <ebj@ku.edu>
> To: "Brahms Dev" <brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov>
> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 1:52 PM
> Subject: [Brahms-dev-l] Flow Norm Weights
>
>
>>
>> Hiro,
>>   Here is an update on the normalization weights.  All but 16 runs  
>> have been completed.  I don't know what's been happening with
>> these last sixteen runs, but I have changed the method a little  
>> bit.  Instead of processing 1billion events, I limited it to
>> 10million.  The results should not change significantly, but the  
>> weight will be calculated faster.  I will keep a closer eye on
>> them.  As for the rest of the runs, I have checked them and I have  
>> committed them to the database.  I will keep a closer eye on
>> the last 16 runs over the day and weekend.
>>   If you want to start processing the DSTs there is a list of runs  
>> that DO NOT have the norm weight committed to the database.
>> 9541 - 9546
>> 9701 - 9711
>> 9836 - 9836
>> 9840 - 9840
>> 9844 - 9844
>> 9845 - 9845
>> 9847 - 9849
>> 9930 - 9930
>> 9945 - 9945
>> 10051 - 10054
>> 10456 - 10456
>> 10458 - 10458
>> 10626 - 10626
>> 10855 - 10875
>> 10948 - 10952
>> 11117 - 11129
>> These runs are NOT calibrated!!!
>>
>>    I have rechecked the flow modules and they seem to be working  
>> correctly.
>>
>>    I will send you an update when more runs are finished.
>> Erik
>> _______________________________________________
>> Brahms-dev-l mailing list
>> Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov
>> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Brahms-dev-l mailing list
> Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov
> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l

_______________________________________________
Brahms-dev-l mailing list
Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l