What do you mean " jobs at KU are not fast if I read the files on /brahms/data** diskes". You can not read RCF disk from KU, can't you? Here is the trick to make loop faster in proof (or any other): Load only variables that you use to proof. For example, in our dst, if you need only some of global variables (say run number, centrality), you can do the following in your Init method of your TSelector class. after a line with fChain->SetMakeClass(1) fChain->SetBranchStatus("*",0); // this disable all variables to be loaded in your class. fChain->SetBranchStatus("R.fRunNumber",1); fChain->SetBranchStatus("G.fCent",1); And, comment out any other SetBranchStatus command to load variables in that method. Now, obviously, you can not read any faster than the hardware IO limit (network, server, disks etc..), but you should be able to read files quite fast, especially from PANASAS disk (/brahms/data21). If you think your jobs are running slow (without competing jobs), it is probably due to IO problem. As I said in the other mail, some brahms/dataXX disks are slow. You can easily see this by "top" command. Run "top" at the machines your jobs are actually running. If you see a more than a few % of IO wait, your IO is the choke point, which you probably can not do anything to improve. If you see that problem, the best option(???) is probably not to run your program since it just make things worse and ask offending person(s) to stop some of jobs (if you can find). Hiro Eun-Joo Kim wrote: >I am reading the output of geant, and it is 50M events. >Maybe I don't need 50M events. >Anyway it took more than 2 hours, and I don't know why. >I think making/killing program is good idea, but just >let you know sometimes the jobs at KU are not fast >if I read the files on /brahms/data** diskes. > >Eun-Joo > > _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Thu Sep 15 16:07:57 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 15 2005 - 16:08:07 EDT