Hello Truls, I've plotted T1 efficiency for "bad" runs in cucu63 data: http://zefir.if.uj.edu.pl/staszel/brahms/fseffic/cucu63_t1/index.html, other detectors look very nice. I don't claim that what your are doing is not correct but certainly using normal acceptance and just correcting for T1 efficiency is also a nice option. I think that you would minimize the losses in statistics that way, because you don't discard any track. In momentum you end up with relatively smooth modulation. By the way, I checked that the latest cucu63 gtr data have been generated on May. Is it because you wait for new multiplicity calibration from Steve? Cheers, Pawel. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Pawel Staszel | | Jagiellonian University | | Institute of Physics email: ufstasze@if.uj.edu.pl | | Reymonta 4 phone: (+48) 12 663 5712 | | Krakow 30059 FAX: (+48) 12 633 7086 | | Poland | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Mon Jul 25 10:28:13 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jul 25 2005 - 10:28:33 EDT