I replied to myself by mistake, I sent this message right after my complaint about the gap module. Djam Hello again, You can ignore this message. I was unwittingly using a version of the tof adc gap module that was older than the one fixed precisely for this problem a month ago. Djam
attached mail follows:
Hello again, You can ignore this message. I was unwittingly using a version of the tof adc gap module that was older than the one fixed precisely for this problem a month ago. Djam Djamel Ouerdane wrote: > Hello devl's, > > Because I'd like to make new DSTs for the 63 GeV runs, I refined the > TOF calibration. > I could commit some new time offsets without any problems last week > but now, > when I want to commit ADC gap stuff, the script runs smoothly but > something > weird occurs then : the comment string I want to attach to the values > I am committing > is obviously greater than 16 characters but still, I get a warning > that it is shorter > than that. That's a 1st hint that something does not propagate > correctly. When I then check > the DB values either from the DAQ website or from one of the brat > based browser, I get > the old values (which are plain wrong by the way). This confirms that > somewhere in > the commit chain, the input is not propagated. > As I said, it works fine for other calibration parameters like time > offsets. Any clue ? > > Djam > > > _______________________________________________ > Brahms-dev-l mailing list > Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov > http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Mon Nov 8 07:35:20 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 08 2004 - 07:37:02 EST