Hi Flemming, > a new set of 63 GeV local tracking files has been made. These are as far > I know optimized for a) DC database calibrations b) bad pads in tpc's c) > good Vdrift for all. great :) > > The are recorded in the filecatalog which more information will be > forthcoming from Hiro. They are stored in the filesystem > /brahms/data19/data/run04/auau/63/ltr (note not seq!) There are also > named according to the official naming i.e > ltr<run>seq<seq>v<version>.root ok. > > The are NOT produced by the masterreduction scripts but rather a set of > new python scripts that submits to the new crs system. The naming of the > <version> number is automatic being incremented when tracking is > succesfully redone. This means that the <version> number can be > different for different run's and still belong to the same production > version. The concept of production version is also introduced. All files > created now are of production version=1. > if <version> can be != from <production>, where is the <production> number? I can also see a drawback in the automatic incrementation: since jobs are submitted in a sequence basis, if for a given run, some jobs failed, you might end up with sequence files of different version number if you had already older ones. > The scripts that produces global tracks have to be modified to pickup > likewise > i) the newest (highest version no) for a given production ltr names now you're talking about <production> and not <version>, is that correct ? > ii) get the proper gtr name and version it's not only a question of composing the right file name string but picking up the adequate (highest) <version> of a given <production>, right? Then, should the gtr <version> be equal to the ltr <version> ? or should the gtr <version> be independent from the ltr <version> and have its own incrementation ? > iii) The gtr files should reside on a different file system e.g. data07 > for au 63 GeV to minimize i/o on a given sun-server. ok. > The geometry is done - even though not committed to the DB the modified > geom is done in > ~videbaek/brahms_app/fv_app/reco/run04/auau/globalTracking.C you mean ~videbaek/brahms_app/fv_app/reco/run04/GlobalTracking.C Will the numbers that I could see in this file be submitted soon ? > This does of course not work because the 'matching files now are no good > any more. I guess so. > - since these are found by running the same data, could one > not then run the tasks by a) run matching alone -> determine matching > offset for a given sequence b) run the same data once more within the > same script having data in a local temp file. This avoids the DB for the > matching which I think is good because the value dependes on > calibrations of TPC, geometry, so whenever these changes the matching > cuts changes. I am aware of the DB issue. Let's see what we can do... > > stay tuned. More to come Djam _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Wed Jun 2 05:53:33 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 05:53:53 EDT