Re: [Brahms-dev-l] Tof ped calibration - bug in BrRawDataInput?

From: flemming videbaek <videbaek@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Date: Thu Apr 15 2004 - 15:41:05 EDT
Oops
This was not the intended algorithm. It is a useful algorithm in so far for
real data it reduces
the output files by about 20-30% in size.
The algo is changed to keep all infor for trigger 8 and 7 (i.e. non beam
events) and committed

Flemming

----------------------------------------------------------------
Flemming Videbaek
Physics Department
Brookhaven National Laboratory

e-mail: videbaek@bnl.gov
phone: 631-344-4106
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Claus O. E. Jorgensen" <ekman@nbi.dk>
To: "brahms-dev" <brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 1:21 PM
Subject: [Brahms-dev-l] Tof ped calibration - bug in BrRawDataInput?


>
> Hi Flemming,
>
> I tried to finish the pedestal calibrations (run 11000 and up), but the
> TOFs didn't have any data in the histograms. Djamel pointed out that
> you've changed something in the BrRawDataInput, and we looked at it. This
> is what it says:
>
>  if( fBeamEvent && (hit_down->tdc < 4000)&& (hit_up->tdc < 4000) ){
>             BrTofDig *digtof_p = new BrTofDig();
>             fH1Table->Add(digtof_p);
>             digtof_p->SetSlatno(ihit+1);
>             digtof_p->SetAdcDown(hit_down->adc);
>             digtof_p->SetAdcUp(hit_up->adc);
>             digtof_p->SetTdcDown(hit_down->tdc);
>             digtof_p->SetTdcUp(hit_up->tdc);
>           }
>
> I guess it means that the TOF data is not transferred for trigger 7 events
> (all pedestal runs). Maybe we should add a fPedestalEvent...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Claus & Djamel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Brahms-dev-l mailing list
> Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov
> http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l
>


_______________________________________________
Brahms-dev-l mailing list
Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov
http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-l
Received on Thu Apr 15 15:34:23 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 15 2004 - 15:34:38 EDT