Hi, Over the weekend and this morning I committed a number of changes to the centrality calibrations for the dAu runs. I checked the changes for runs in brahms/data12/reduced03. A summary plot is at http://kunuc6.phsx.ukans.edu/~sanders/CentCheck.gif with the corresponding root macro http://kunuc6.phsx.ukans.edu/~sanders/CentCheck.C if you want to check specific run numbers in more detail. The first panel, labeled Ratio, gives the 60-80%/0-20% yield ratio. The panel labeled Scaled SiMult-TileMult is pretty much as advertised, although the difference is divided by (average mult+10). The two panels labeled Tile and Si single mip peak are from Gaussian+exponential background fits. The Gaussian centroids and width are shown. The other two panels just show the pedestal location and widths. I believe the calibrations are now reasonable. In general, the SiMA was not happy during much of the dAu run. Enough of the array was misbehaving for runs 8277-8366 and 8452-8505 that I've had to switch to a TMA only calibration for these ranges. Different calibrations were needed for the two ranges since one of the tiles (tile5_3) was also not functioning for the earlier run set. For other runs I've had to switch off in the analysis particular SiMA strips and wafers, but I think enough of the array was present to leave it in the centrality calibration. The "Gold" run, where the analysis for the mult paper was done, is 8404. I have redone the geant simulation for the runs where tile5_3 was off to get the correct efficiency correction for these runs. Regards, Steve _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Mon Feb 9 11:01:06 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 09 2004 - 11:01:30 EST