On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Flemming Videbaek wrote: > > Well as far I can see Zhangbao wrote the module. I just added it into > the > grt scripts. Have no clue if it works, it requeres adc pde do they > exsist!? > The default cuts (dx) do not look reasonable to me either 0.5 cm -> 3.5 > just for checkout. You can look soon for run 10051 and see if this works Hi Flemming and Eun-Joo. I was just about to try the same thing, so I looked into the official AuAuGlobalTracking.C a bit. Two things: First of all, the TFW2 module Flemming added didn't get it's parameters set properly: // //TOFW track matching // BrMrsTfw2MatchingModule* tfw2match = new BrMrsTfw2MatchingModule("MRS", "MRS Tfw2 Matching module"); match->SetNtuple(kTRUE); match->SetTdcRange(10, 4000); // default is [10, 4000] match->SetMaxAdc(100000); // default is 0.5 match->SetMaxDX(3.5); // default is 0.5 match->SetNoPedWidth(10); // default is 50 swModule->AddModule(tfw2match); while TOFW matching now has some odd parameters. I've fixed this in the official file on bramreco, but not re-done the tracking. Secondly, I see we still run with ffs->SetUseTrackBeamVtx(kTRUE); // Use track beam vtx for p+p and d+au, // otherwise // we get in trouble with events that // have no bb vertex Is this the intended behaviour? I'd have thought that for AuAu the bb vertex would be pretty stable. (On the other hand I haven't been to BNL yet for this run, so I'm not quite up to speed...) Thirdly, is there any reason not to automatically convert the first-generation local track files to ltr<*>v01.root? E.g. this script: ~bramreco/bhs/reco/run2ltr.py could be set to do this at the end of reconstruction. These files really are the version1 that we'll use, so I think this should be done (saves us all the 'if ltrVersion==0 then' workarounds, plus forces us to use the versioning scheme ;-) Ping :-) --Bjorn > Flemming > > While waiting for beam- and some trigger checkout. > It is now pouring, I wonder if snow and ice is not better than rain. > > > Eun-Joo Kim said: > > Dear All, > > > > I am working on C4, and I found... we need TFW2. > > Actually I am getting trouble in TFW2 calibration and so on. > > Is anybody working on TFW2? > > > > Some gtr files in /brahms/data14/data/run04 doesn't have any TFW2 > > matching, whoever it is, would you put the TFW2 matching module? > > > > Thanks... > > > > Eun-Joo > > > > -- Bjorn H. Samset Phone: 22856465/92051998 PhD student, heavy ion physics Adr: Schouterrassen 6 Inst. of Physics, University of Oslo 0573 Oslo \|/ ----------------------------> -*- <----------------------------- /|\ _______________________________________________ Brahms-dev-l mailing list Brahms-dev-l@lists.bnl.gov http://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/brahms-dev-lReceived on Wed Feb 4 06:27:46 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 04 2004 - 06:28:01 EST