From: Djamel Ouerdane (ouerdane@nbi.dk)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 16:36:38 EST
Hi, Yesterday, I made a reconstruction test of a run taken very recently (7255) as well as a pedestal cal test (run 71xx, don't remember). I wanted to check if what is in the latest brat (modules and scripts) works fine for people who will have the task to run it intensively. The test run was written to /brahms/data01/reduced03, which seemed to me not a so bad place. I wanted to proceed further to check the BB data, etc, after having checked that the local tracking performed well (Peter can confirm, he saw the histograms). But someone decided that it was not good and deleted it _without any warning_. I've complained several times about people using bramreco in a wild way but this time is the worst. This is not a behaviour to have. Before deleting anything, if you judge it necessary, SEND A SHORT NOTICE!!!!!! I don't want to use rude words or speak too bad but to me, this looks like some sabotage. If anyone in the future behaves like this, she or he is invited to resign from her or his position in BRAHMS and do something else. Now, this brings up the question : how do we use bramreco ? There's gonna be a load of people using it soon. This has to be discplined. This requires strict rules. ASAP. Djam PS: again, to the person using masterReduction.sh, please, DO NOT put your special setting directly in the script but USE THE COMMAND OPTIONS! or make a copy of this script and call it whatever you want and modify this copy as you like. -- Djamel Ouerdane ------------------------------------------o | Niels Bohr Institute | Home: | | Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Ø | Jagtvej 141 2D, | | Fax: +45 35 32 50 16 | DK-2200 Copenhagen N | | Tel: +45 35 32 52 69 | +45 35 86 19 74 | | http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane | | ouerdane@nbi.dk | o---------------------------------------------------------o
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 08 2003 - 16:37:51 EST