Re: Proposing BRAT/bratmain addition (PLEASE READ!)

From: Flemming Videbaek (videbaek@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov)
Date: Wed Dec 11 2002 - 19:54:50 EST

  • Next message: Christian Holm Christensen: "Re: automake question" 
    Hi Just a few comments

and to be frank I have NOT read the complete reply. Some commetnts worth
mentionining are

a)  I have yet to see a single person in the coll. who as part of an
analysis saves the script used with an appropriate name as well as the
BRAT version for each single run analyzed. . Ideally if one kept track of
this there would be no need for any other mechanism.

b) thus as a secondary mechnism that invokes some kind of storage of what
was done is a USEFUL concept. Bjoern and I did in fact also discuss
instead of a structure storing the 'script' as I belive you mention - and
if this things are labelled/named this would be a better documentation
than what we have i.e. none at this point together with any analysis. The
implementation may be different by is essentially the same namely that
EVERY settable parameter is stored in a human readeable file.

I think this should be kept in mind and we should do what is needed with
minimal impact, resources -, but let us continue the discussion and lets
us hear from more people.

cheers

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 11 2002 - 20:05:45 EST