From: Djamel Ouerdane (ouerdane@nbi.dk)
Date: Tue Dec 10 2002 - 15:36:02 EST
Ciao Bjørn, After having skimmed your message (sorry, i don't have time to do more right now), it looks like very cool. I don't know if all details are ok or if some new ideas or changes should be added or redesigned but the overall stuff should be operational soon. I'm repeating myself, but, in that spirit, who wants to take care of the reduction and calibration book-keeping ? If I didn't have a thesis to write (sorry if I sound arrogant, it's not meant), I'd be glad to do it. Unfortunately, time is running fast. The next run will start soon and we still live with the 2001 data mess (i'm not talking about the 2000 prehistorical brahms data). Another code cleaning will occur hopefully soon (track matching parameter DB and DST stuff). Claus, with a little help from Peter, me and _hopefully_ (big) help from Christian will redesign (or maybe less strong than that) the DST framework. Like Christian says, the weak point is the data structure and I'm quite convinced that designing a rock solid data structure will make it very easy to write standard analysis modules. I do hope this will happen. If so, BRAHMS will rock and roll :) Djam -- Djamel Ouerdane ------------------------------------------o | Niels Bohr Institute | Home: | | Blegdamsvej 17, DK-2100 Ø | Jagtvej 141 2D, | | Fax: +45 35 32 50 16 | DK-2200 Copenhagen N | | Tel: +45 35 32 52 69 | +45 35 86 19 74 | | http://www.nbi.dk/~ouerdane | | ouerdane@nbi.dk | o---------------------------------------------------------o
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Dec 10 2002 - 16:32:36 EST