Re: follow up of pid...

From: Djamel Ouerdane (ouerdane@nbi.dk)
Date: Wed Nov 20 2002 - 05:25:42 EST

  • Next message: yin.zhongbao@fi.uib.no: "Re: follow up of pid..."
    On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Yin Zhongbao wrote:
    
    > Dear brahms-dev,
    > 
    > I think it could be done in preloop to evaluate 1/beta-1/beta(calculated)
    > and R-R(calculated). 
    
    What's that ?
    
    > And it would be nice since it gives momentum
    > dependent values. But for high momentum case or some other setting, I am
    > not sure if we have enough statistics, may one fit it with a function when
    > there are enough statistics and give a general function good to
    > extrapolate to low statistic case.
    > 
    > My concern goes to the method CalculateMomentum. There may have an
    > assumption that the track has passed through all of detectors in FS and
    > momenta pd2, pd3 and pd4 are reconstructed. Otherwise, for example, if pd4
    > = 0 it may give a wrong value. Is it not possible to happen?
    
    don't worry about that, there's a boolean flag as far as I remember which 
    should prevent from falling into these situations.
    
    Djam
    
    
    
    > 
    > Thanks for discussion.
    > 
    > Best regards,
    > Zhongbao
    > 
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 20 2002 - 05:26:20 EST