Steve, Could you let me know which run you are looking at. I am using the new stuff on the rcas and I have not seen the particular errors you indicate and given what I have done I should have unless there is some angle setting not inserted into the geometry db correctly. Also, tell me where your config script is and I will see what I can see. Kris Stephen J. Sanders wrote: > OK, I'll report another strangeness: > > I've been trying to replay the tofw data to look at the correlation of > the > number of hits with centrality. I've developed a module that is working > fine on my local ppc (macintosh). On rcas the geo manager seems to be > screwed up: I'm getting multiple errors of the type > > TOFW slat number 22 is out of bound > TOFW slat number 23 is out of bound > TOFW slat number 24 is out of bound > TOFW slat number 25 is out of bound > TOFW slat number 26 is out of bound > ...etc > > > Also, if I try to access the geo DB for TPM1 I get: > Warning in <BrGeometryDbManager::GetDetectorVolume>: For TPM1 Failed > > On my local system I'm not seeing this problem. > I stopped using the local .geo ascii files on my home system since it > looked like > the DB was working. Thinking that I might have managed to get > different code on rcas from what I'm using locally, I deleted my brat > and personal module directory as well as my bratmain script on > rcas and did an scp transfer from home to rcas, then recompiled. I'm > at a loss as to > what I might have screwed up. My next step will be to go back to the > ascii geometry files, but > I haven't checked this yet. > > ...steve > > > Ian Bearden wrote: > >> Hello Dev-iants, >> I have been trying (and trying..) to (re-re-re-re-re-)reduce data. I >> am not >> having such a good time of it. For the past week or so, my guess is >> since >> the upgrade to RH7.2, I have been losing 10-30% of the sequences due >> to the >> reduction code crashing. >> I am now running with much higher verbosity and debug levels, which I >> hope >> will help. While this is ongoing, though, I though I would just see if >> anyone else has had similar problems in the past few days. I had >> hoped that >> the problems would disappear with new BRAT version, but they do not. >> Could >> this be because of the problems with gcc2.96? I don't have any >> really good >> ideas, but surely some of ya'll know more than I do... >> Ian >> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 18 2002 - 10:20:19 EDT