Hi I corrected a bug that I myself had introduced. When I copied the offset stuff from TPM1 I forgot to actually change the placement of tpm2 in eg_tpm2.F. Now it has been done and I get good agreement when I match simulated brag data in brat using the geometry database (see brahms_app/pc_app/brag/digitize for examples). The funny thing was that when I just used the default geometry in brag for TPM2 and tried to reconstruct the data using the brat geometry I got sort of the same strange dAng vs p behavior as is seen in the real data). I also noted that the padpidtch in brat is 0.39 and 0.40 in TPM1. I seem to recall that 0.39 is the correct, but could someone tell me ? Also, if anybody has made some real progress on the digitization of tof in brag and reconstruction a few lines would be greatly appreciated. Cheers Peter P.s : I did not tag a new revision -- :-) --------------------------- )-: Peter H L Christiansen @ NBI EMAIL : pchristi@nbi.dk OFFICE : Tb1@NBI (353 25269) HOME : Hjertensfrydsgade 3, st <-- New PHONE : 40840492 (Mobile) :-D --------------------------- \-:
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed Mar 13 2002 - 17:54:25 EST