Last Chance to edit "final" version of NIM Paper

From: Kris Hagel (hagel@CyclotronMail.tamu.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 19 2001 - 01:43:36 EDT

  • Next message: Djamel Ouerdane: "Re: new BRAT updates and version"

    Hello,
    I try to send this again as the version I sent earlier in the afternoon
    seems to have vanished into the bowels of the internet.  It appears that I
    can't submit to brahms-l anymore, so I hope all interested parties are on
    the brahms-dev-l list server.  Anyway....
    
    I am at BNL and have worked with Flemming this week to put the "final" touches 
    on the NIM paper.  I have come up with a version which I believe to be very
    near the final version and I intend to transmit it to Tom Ludlam tomorrow, 
    19-Oct-2001 after I sleep off this night shift.  This version is posted on
    the BRAHMS Web site, namely
    http://www.sdcc.bnl.gov/brahms/private/detectors/NIM/BrahmsNIMPaper-18Oct2001.doc,
    .ps
    
    If you care to, you can download the document and read through it once more
    before it "goes to press" (ie Tom).  We will accept and consider for inclusion
    any comments/suggestion that are received on or before 12:00 Texas time, 
    Friday, 19-Oct-2001.  For a comment/suggestion to be considered for inclusion,
    
    1. We must agree with them
    2. It must be feasible
    
    To increase the chance of your suggestion to be considered for inclusion,
    please follow these guidelines:
    1. If you have suggestions for text, please send a paragraph.
    2. If you want to change a number, please send the corrected number.
    3. If you want a new or changed figure, please send the figure as an attachment
       (preferrably a high resolution gif file)
    
    I think the emphasis on this "last" re-reading should be to insure that 
    all numbers quoted are correct and consistent.
    
    Having said all this, I want to thank everyone who took the time to read the
    document carefully after it was released for collaboration wide review.  There
    were many good comments (in addition to a number of unfeasible ones; ie figures
    that don't exist that I have no practical way of generating) which I think
    will make this a valuable document as we progress with BRAHMS.
    
    Regards 
    
    Kris
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Oct 19 2001 - 14:01:13 EDT