Dear Peter,
I had a part draft in my draft folders of a response, and thought you had a
bad macro - this is still true but there is also a real problem as I
realized this morning - All the accp plots etc
I have made recently is all done using the 'old' bramreco gbrahms code.
Since this is a pure translatation it ought to work but alas, who knows what
has happened.
-- Since I don't like to have unfinished business I did a few check
a) The same scripts that failed for me on rcas0007 with (recent brag) worked
on
pii4 , albeit with a somewhat earlier version.
so
b) I checked out the version from CVS did a clean re-build and
amazingly IT WORKS !!!
c) Last step before a cup of coffee..
- tried to checkout and compile brag from fresh, but ran into trouble
since
somehow it did not find kuipc despite the fact that I configure
with --with-cern-libdir=/cern/2000/lib and
--with-cern-bin=/cern/2000/bin to get the same lib's as on pii's
configure decides there is no kuipc event though it is in my path
I GIVE UP.
------------------------------------------------------
Flemming Videbaek
Physics Department
Brookhaven National Laboratory
tlf: 631-344-4106
fax 631-344-1334
e-mail: videbaek@bnl.gov
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter H. L. Christiansen" <pchristi@nbi.dk>
To: <brahms-dev-l@bnl.gov>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: Gbrahms question
> Hi Fellow BRAHMSers
>
> I took a look at BRAG again and found that nothing had changed. I tried
> checking out the version with TAG start rev 1.1.1.1 and there was the same
> problems as reported earlier (see below).
>
> I just wanted to here if anybody ran my test example in the meantime and
> saw the same problems ?
>
> The test files can be picked up at :
>
http://www.sdcc.bnl.gov/brahms/private/list_hyper/brahms-dev-l/1311.html
>
> Cheers
> Peter
>
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Peter H. L. Christiansen wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > I have been trying to throw pions through the FFS but seems to hit
> > something, either right before or right after D1 50% of the time, even
> > though I throw in a very narrow p,theta,phi region. The strange thing is
> > that if I use Pawels old gbrahms I get the expected behaviour where
almost
> > all pions make it through T1 and T2.
> >
> > I have compared the 2 magnet files produced by gbrahms and they are
> > identical. There is a slight offset <2 cm of T1 and T2 in the geofile,
but
> > that should not change anything. If I go through the geometry using
dtree
> > it seems to me that the only difference is that the calibration chambers
> > have been removed in brag and if I compare the files in src/fms1, the
only
> > difference is the small changes to T1 and T2.
> >
> > Does anyone have an idea ?
> >
> > I have made a small test script that I used and added that and the
> > necessary files as an attachment. It works fine for both gbrahms and
brag
> > and shoot pions 1 by 1.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Peter
> >
> > You will need the init.kumac from the brag you use (in share/brag) to
run
> > the test. Do brag and then exec test.
> >
> >
>
> --
> :-) --------------------------------- )-:
> |Peter H L Christiansen aka PAN @ NBI |
> |EMAIL : pchristi@nbi.dk |
> |OFFICE : Tb1 @ NBI |
> |PHONE : 353 25269 |
> |SNAIL : Hans Tavsensgade 35, 4th |
> |PHONE : 35 349336 |
> :-D --------------------------------- \-:
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Sep 21 2001 - 09:53:29 EDT