Dear Djamel, (and others) Where is this package intended to be submitted - into the tof library? or in an application package. This is unclear to me, though some sounds like tof stuff and others as if belonging to somewhere else. Maybe the 'new' structure delas better with this. Why is the BrTofCalibration not called something with Parameter? BrTofCalibrationParameters or whatver fit into CH scheme \> > One last thought: while I was updating all that, I realized how important > it was to converge towards some standard and automatic procedure. So, to > second Christian's voice, I strongly recommand we use the main module thing. One this question there is a realy issue how to enhance to capabilties of the MainModule. It is not all kind of analysis that fits into this framework in Event(rawdata, outputdata) in particular the tracking needs more sophisticated analysis, and I think PID as well when we come to that. Essentially I think once has to be able to specify (in pesudo code) something like container1.Add(module1) container1.Add(module2) container.SetInputNode(rawevent); container.SetOutputNode(reduced1) cointainer2.SetInputNode(reduced1) container2.SetOutputNode(rdonode) container2(addmodule3) container2(addmodule4) outputmodule.SetInputNode(rdonode) And then having a module do the work Any ideas, comments? Flemming ------------------------------------------------------ Flemming Videbaek Physics Department Brookhaven National Laboratory tlf: 631-344-4106 fax 631-344-1334
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 24 2001 - 20:35:47 EDT