Hi, I have been working on reconciling the new mult code with the old. I was able to track down one significant difference in the two calculations to the approx. 2 cm difference found between the BB and TPM1 vertices. In the "old" analysis, I had explicitly worked this into the vertex I (illegally) passed to the BrRdoModuleMult class. However, putting such an artificial offset into the BrSiRdoMult and BrTileRdoTile classes (both of which need the vertex) is likely to cause consternation in the future. Is there a reason why this offset is not incorporated in the vertex returned by the BrRdoBB module? For the moment, I have updated the mult modules to incorporate the vertex offset. There are still differences between the si and tile energies reported by the "old" and "new" code for which I have not yet been able to identify causes. ...steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 12 2001 - 23:17:00 EDT