Dear Hiro,
            is the mean ZDC vertex itself multiplicity dependent?
It is possible that their is a problem with slewing. I am working
on setting up the ZDC database and putting more slewing corrections
in.
                        Michael
Quoting Hironori Ito <hito@students.phsx.ukans.edu>:
> 	Hello.   The figure includes any events which ZDC and TPM1 cluster
> vertex exist.  (I have to have TPM1 since that is what I am comparing 
> with.)  There is no additional cuts.  Unless the TPM1 cluster vertex
> has
> multiplicity dependence, which I have not heard such a dependence, it is
> coming
> from ZDC vertex.   Maybe, the slewing correction is not quite right???
> 
> 	Hiro
> 
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Michael Murray wrote:
> 
> >   Dear Hiro,
> >           I guess that the figure was made only
> > for events in which the BB and the TPM1 vertex
> > failed. If so the effect you see could be induced
> > by an (multiplicity dependent)
> > inefficency in the vertex algorithm of 
> > these detectors. Could you please remake the
> > same plot for an unbiased sample of events from
> > the same run. Ideally that would be just ZDC triggers.
> >            Yours Michael
> > 
> > Quoting Hironori Ito <hito@students.phsx.ukans.edu>:
> > 
> > > 	Well.  I have another thought about fixing manually.  I can not
> > > fix manually since I only use ZDC vertex when I do not have good
> vertex
> > > from BB or TPM1.  This means that I can not fix ZDC since I do not
> have
> > > any other reference to fix ZDC Vertex.  
> > > 
> > >   hiro
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Hironori Ito wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 	Hello.  I have a question.  I remember reading the e-mail about
> > > > ZDC_Vertex do not have Multiplicity dependence.  Well, I think it
> is
> > > > there.  Look at the figure "ZDC_TPM1_vertex.ps" in
> > > > "http://pii3.brahms.bnl.gov/~hito".  The figure is produced from
> > > > run 2336.  In this figure, the vertical scale is
> > > > ZDC vertex - TPM1 (cluster) vertex, and the horizontal scale is
> BB
> > > > Mult.  Of cause, it is possible that BB Mult is wrong.  But, if I
> use
> > > > other mult such as Si and Tile mult, I see the same thing. 
> > > Furthermore, I
> > > > do not see this much dependence from BBVertex - TPM1 Vertex
> although
> > > > BBVertex have other problem.  Can someone look at this?  The fix
> is
> > > > needed since multiplicity in Si can easily is affected by 3-4 cm
> shift
> > > of
> > > > vertex.  Until it is fixed, I will manually (in my own code) fix
> > > ZDCVertex
> > > > to align to TPM1 vertex.  
> > > > 
> > > > 	Hiro
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Michael Murray, Cyclotron TAMU, 979 845 1411 x 273, Fax 1899
> > 
> 
Michael Murray, Cyclotron TAMU, 979 845 1411 x 273, Fax 1899
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 19 2001 - 14:49:10 EST