Re: Vertex

From: Anders Holm (aholm@alf.nbi.dk)
Date: Thu Nov 09 2000 - 07:55:34 EST

  • Next message: Yury Blyakhman: "Re: BBRdo Questions..."

    Hej Bjørn, Christian ...
    
    If you considder a weighted average a fit to a constant then you should
    take as weight factors 1/sqr(sigma) assuming you have uncertainties
    which you trust.  
    
    For this to be reasonable the reduced Chi-squared calculated for the set
    of Vertexes using these sigmas should be between 0.1 and 2, i.e. none of
    the values should be more than a few of its own sigmas away from the
    average.
    
    So a ZDC vertex should not destroy resolution if it is less than a few of
    its own sigmas off.
    
    Example
      If       a = 100 +-1  and   b = 90 +- 10
      then    wa = 0.99     and  wb = 0.01
    
      Average    = 100*0.99 + 90*0.01 = 99.9
      SigmaAvg   = sqrt(sqr(0.99*1) + sqr(0.01*10))
                 = sqrt(0.98 + 0.01)  = 0.995
    
    Thus a ZDC vertex does not say much unless it is way off.
    
    Anders
    
    =========================================================
    Anders Holm                     email:   aholm@nbi.dk
    Niels Bohr institute            phone:   (45) 35 32 52 13 
    University of Copenhagen        fax:     (45) 35 32 50 16
    Blegdamsvej 17
    DK-2100 Copenhagen
    Denmark
    ========================================================
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 09 2000 - 07:56:01 EST