Re: small change in BrRawDataInput

From: Djamel Ouerdane (ouerdane@nbi.dk)
Date: Tue Jul 25 2000 - 13:02:09 EDT

  • Next message: Alv Kjetil Holme: "Re: small change in BrRawDataInput" 

    Hi Alv,

I'm a bit suprised by what you described but I understand your point: it
is due to the fact that the SetxxxOff methods are based on the SetxxxOn
methods. So I can see 2 ways to remedy to that:

1- one way is to decouple these methods and have the set of SetxxxOff
completly independant from the SetxxxOn

2- the second is to keep fAllOn, fFSOn or fMRSOn kTRUE (instead of the 
passed value) when you set off a
particular detector, that's to say:

for instance MTP1: 
void SetMTP1On(const Bool_t val = kTRUE) { fMTP1On = val; fMRSOn =
kTRUE; fAllOn = kTRUE;} instead of val all the time.

Does it sound reasonable?
Djamel

:o) ****************************************************** )o:
|ME	: Djamel Ouerdane   EMAIL  : ouerdane@nbi.dk         |
|OFFICE : Tb1 @ NBI	    PHONE  : +45 353 252 69 (office) |
|INST   : Niels Bohr Institute,                              | 
|         Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 København Ø, Danmark          |
|HOME   : c/o Peter Christiansen                             |  
|         Sdr. Fasanvej 14, ST, 2000 Frederiksberg, DK       |
:oD ****************************************************** \o:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 25 2000 - 13:02:26 EDT