On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 05:07:46PM +0200, I. G. Bearden wrote: > > Of course it evaluates p/q, that is what magnets do. > Minor nit pick- magnets measure q/p, not the other way round. K.O. > I was only making the > (trivial) point that > there will be particles for which TMath::Abs(charge)>1. Sadly, there will not > be many such > particles, but the few we get are interesting (to me, anyway) and we should > not eliminate the > possibility of looking at them by non-optimally clever decisions. > The refitting is actually just a multiplication, though, isn't it? i.e. if > q=2, p_correct = 2*p_reconstructed. > > Also, I think I have sorted out the geometry problems I mentioned earlier, but > now > I'm a bit dizzy from playing with the 3D stuff in root. > > > > > > Flemming > > Cheers, > > -- > Ian-------------------------------------------------------------------- > | I.G. Bearden | > | Niels Bohr Institute Tb 3 email: bearden@nbi.dk | > | Blegdamsvej 17 phone: (+45) 35 32 53 23 | > | København Ø FAX: (+45) 31 42 10 16 | > | Danmark | > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- Konstantin Olchanski Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, New York olchansk@bnl.gov
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 22 2000 - 11:18:04 EDT