Ian, I assume you are generating local tracks for T1 and T2 and then trying to match them using the BrFSTrackingModule. I had put that together and although things are foggy, I had it "working" for tracks that went T2-T5, T2-T4 and T2-T3. I was beginning to work on T1-T2 tracks that didn't have T3-T5 when I started putting out another fire. There was also some question as to exactly what a T1-T2 track would look like software wise which was not resolved and that made that a good breaking point. So that is the status of that give or take a little. Kris "I. G. Bearden" wrote: > > > Dear All, > > Since I have not had an opportunity to prove my ignorance all day, I thought I would > > make one! I have been trying to run (a very nice prototype) > > reconstruction+pid code written by Djamel. As an input to this code, I am using > > a digitized file containing data from only the FFS, i.e. T1,T2, and H1. > > This seemed to me a reasonable thing to try as when the collisions do finally > > start coming, that is what we will use to measure them. > > And now, to my ignorance... > > I thought it should be possible to get tracks using just T1 and T2, but it seems > > not to be the case. Is this because I have done something non-optimally-smart, > > or because we have not yet implemented such FFSTracks? > > Any help/info/comments are very welcome. > > Cheers, > > -- > Ian-------------------------------------------------------------------- > | I.G. Bearden | > | Niels Bohr Institute Tb 3 email: bearden@nbi.dk | > | Blegdamsvej 17 phone: (+45) 35 32 53 23 | > | København Ø FAX: (+45) 31 42 10 16 | > | Danmark | > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 14 2000 - 19:34:56 EDT