Dear All, Can we not come to some consensus on the definitions of /old /pro /new /dev ? IF we could do that, we could avoid the problem experienced by KO, as well as myself. I guess that /pro should be a version that works, and should not be updated terribly often, /new should be the stable working version V(N-1 or 2) and /dev the newest V(N). /dev should be updatable on the slightest whim, while /new should involve at least a bit of notification to (at a minimum) this list. /pro should only be changed after notification of the larger BrCommunity. Well, there is my 16.58 ore worth. Cheers, Ian-------------------------------------------------------------------- | I.G. Bearden | | Niels Bohr Institute Tb 3 email: bearden@nbi.dk | | Blegdamsvej 17 phone: (+45) 35 32 53 23 | | København Ø FAX: (+45) 31 42 10 16 | | Danmark | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 27 2000 - 15:00:24 EDT