Re: BrDigSi

From: Hironori Ito (hito@students.phsx.ukans.edu)
Date: Thu May 25 2000 - 21:41:46 EDT

  • Next message: Anders Holm: "Organization of Brat source code"

    	Hello.  This is Hiro.  I guess I have caused the major pain in the
    software development for the last several days since I committed the
    change.  Well, I would like to fix whatever I did wrong.  However, in my
    directory, I do not have any problem compiling and running brat.  Can
    anyone tell me how I can get the same error?  Or if someone knows what I
    am doing wrong, please let me know.
    
    	Hiro
    
    
    On Thu, 25 May 2000 hagel@comp.tamu.edu wrote:
    
    > Hello,
    > I have been trying to get the operator/monitor stuff in order.  The
    > $BRATSYS I point to is the VER-1-6.  I have found numerous problems with
    > this version.
    > 
    > 1. In mult/src/BrMonitorMult.cxx accessed a variable named kNumTilesChan
    > which was defined as a private member of BrDigTiles.h (I think).  This
    > had been changed to a global variable by VER-1-6-1
    > 
    > 2. BrRawDataInput tries to create BrDigSi which is in the
    > $BRATSYS/include, but is in mult_bad/inc in the distribution.  Since it
    > is in the include dir, all compiles, but then fails at runtime.  This
    > file is totally removed in VER-1-6-1 as well as the reference to it in
    > BrRawDataInput
    > 
    > Seeing these errors, I don't know how it even compiled when I got it out
    > of the repository and built it.  Anyway, others are bound to run into
    > this, so I would propose moving the pro to VER-1-6-1 or later if we feel
    > that we can have a release without these glowering errors.
    > 
    > I have stopped working on the operator/monitor until I get some feedback
    > (or get impatient).  I could get things running, but it would be putting
    > bandaids on things which would bite us soon enough.
    > 
    > Also, I have not received any comment regarding root/brat on afs.  This
    > would be a good time to change BRATSYS to point to that if we have
    > agreement.  My personal opinion is that it will work well.
    > 
    > Regards
    > 
    > Kris
    > 
    > 
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 25 2000 - 21:43:24 EDT