On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 07:18:26PM -0500, hagel@comp.tamu.edu wrote: > Hi Konstantin and all, > I removed the references to the proxy stuff from the BrRawDataInput shortly > after you announced that DisIO and BrRawIO objects were 1st class root > citizens. As I usually do, I didn't remove the proxy code stuff for several > reasons. The real reason is that it didn't dawn on me. The unreal reason is > that when I am never sure if I need something again and although I hear about > CVS attics, I prefer to leave things were they are. The second reason is > that the proxy stuff has some techniques that I might use for other things > and wanted an easy way to look it up. Anyway if you feel like removing the > proxy stuff, go ahead. > I did not know that they are not used. If so, I do not have to do anything. I do not mind too much having unused files floating around, so it's up to Kris to keep them or delete. K.O. > > Kris > > Konstantin Olchanski wrote: > > > Folks, I started looking at the BRAT code and in the brat/raw/src > > directory we have the proxy objects for DisIO (BrDisIOProxy) > > and BrRawIO (BrRawIOProxy). These were introduced some time ago > > when the original objects imported from the daq-online domain > > were root-unfriendly. > > > > Since then, the DisIO and BrRawIO objects have been corrected to > > play nice with root and there ought to be no need for the proxies. > > > > I would also like to make them 1-st class root citizens. > > > > Is there still any need for the proxies or can I get rid of them? > > > > -- > > Konstantin Olchanski > > Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, New York > > olchansk@bnl.gov > -- Konstantin Olchanski Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, New York olchansk@bnl.gov
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 14 2000 - 10:19:22 EDT